Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vineet bhatia's avatar

The real risk lies in the residual inventory of stock ull hold. So in nut shell, it's a play on orient being undervalued or not. If in some ones mind it's undervalued, then only he will go for this transaction, but then - why would he offer his shares in open offer for 8% at 50% acceptance ratio while keeping his 50% exposure for further gains.

However if a person thinks oriend is over valued and hence takes a pint on acceptamce ratio only. The 50% acceptance which gives him 8% on total capital has an assumption that orient price won't fallapost acquisition. And hence the 8% is not at all risk free in that sense.

Expand full comment
Aravind Sankeerth's avatar

Your assumptions and theories appear to be accurate across all three cases, and your observations have been duly reported as perceived.

Regarding the IDFC First case, the issue stemmed from weak fundamentals prevalent within the private banking sector as a whole.

In the matter of Orient Cement, I believe it represents an exceptional investment opportunity, particularly given its closer alignment with the Birla group rather than the Adani group. However, your table, indicating a potential timeline of 10 months to navigate prevailing uncertainties, casts a shadow over the valuation differential.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts